Access Keys:
Skip to content (Access Key - 0)

Notes on measuring luminosity

Added by Paul Hubbard , last edited by Paul Hubbard on Jun 03, 2010 20:00.

Labels

sitenews sitenews Delete
luminosity luminosity Delete
Enter labels to add to this page:
Please wait 
Looking for a label? Just start typing.

I continue to work on the photometer project, this weekend I worked with my expert friend Steve Newsome a bit.

Some updates as I learn more about the problem:

  • The standard for measuring luminosity, ISO 17514 requires that you illuminate the dial for a certain amount of time with a specified amount of precisely defined light.

According to this excellent page, those specs are

According to Steve, the D65 is most closely matched by a xenon lamp, which I dislike. I'd prefer to use LEDs, mounted in a collar around the to-be-pictured fixture.

From looking at this graph from Kronometric's writeup, I'd say that more than 1,000 lux is useless:

(Image credit: Kronometric)

He also lists excitation as 200-450nm, and there are definitely LEDs in that range. Most affordable seems to be either 365 or 375nm; the 200nm ones are tens to hundreds of dollars each. (And hazardous, too, you can easily fry an eyeball with deep UV.)

Designing a circuit

Right now, I'm thinking of most-simple: eight LEDs, with a simple switch to power them, nothing fancy at this point. I found this awesome LED design wizard which suggests this circuit:

That's conservative, power-wise, but should provide good lifetime.

I should probably note that my 5-LED UV flashlight will charge up a dial to crazy brightness in less than 30 seconds, so 8 higher-power LEDs should saturate the hell out of a dial.

I'm bummed to not have the ISO spec for scientific comparisons, but hey, maybe someday. I can, I think, measure to my own satisfaction how much UV illumination it takes to saturate and just standardize on that.

Progress!

blog comments powered by Disqus
Adaptavist Theme Builder Powered by Atlassian Confluence